Most helpful client reviews
25 of 27 humans found the following review helpful.
Average Training Shoe
By RLH
I purchased the grey, which actually has a suede upper rather than leather. I’ve worn the 621 and 622 and liked them both. While still a decent shoe, the 623 is not as good. Here’s what I don’t like equated to the other models: the suede upper does not give as much lateral support – in fact, I have to keep tightening the shoe strings all around my workout; the shoe runs a little larger than the other models; but most of all, the forefront cushioning is not very good at all. Now, I use my shoes for working out and cross-training, so if you just want a walking/work shoe, this ought to be fine; just doesn’t do that well with heavy pounding. If you get the 623 for exercise, opt for the one with a leather upper – probably better. However, one plus for the suede is that it is cooler and more breathable than the leather, so if you wear all day, something to consider.
13 of 13 persons found the following review helpful.
A step backwards in Design
By Wiwat
I have purchased dozens of New Balance cross trainers over the years, begining with the 601 or 602. In my view, each new model was an betterment in ease and stability. When I started out using the 623 I not long back purchased to replace my worn out 622′s, I could not believe it. Compared to the 622, this shoe is lighter by at least 2 ounces, less sturdy, has less heelshock absorption, and has less aid for the front of the foot. I took assorted painful 3 mile walks before I decisive to toss these 623′s. These shoes were a waste of $60. 622′s seem to be in very short supply on Amazon and elsewhere. I hope this does not portend discontinuation. If so, I’m going to begin stockpiling 622′s.
11 of 11 persons found the following review helpful.
MX 623 is just Fair
By Frank Burns
Made in China, this model did not fit as well as former NB purchases and is devoid of ventilation. Cheaply made and it shows. Will not buy this model again.
See all 113 client reviews…
